We earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you. This never influences our rankings.
Independent rankings, no fluff

Bidet Environmental Impact: Trees Saved and Water Used

Every year Americans alone use roughly 34 million rolls of toilet paper per day, stripping forests and consuming billions of gallons of water to pulp, bleach and ship a product that gets flushed the moment it is used. A bidet replaces most of that paper with a small stream of rinse water, and the numbers on which approach actually harms the planet less are more nuanced than either side admits. This guide works through the published data on paper production, bidet water use, tree loss, carbon footprint and wastewater impact so you can make an informed call.

Why Trust Best Flushing Toilets

  • Flushing power and MaP flush-test scores
  • Water efficiency (GPF and EPA WaterSense)
  • Aggregated owner reviews
  • Clog resistance and trapway design
  • Brand reliability and warranty

Research updated June 2026.

Quick Answer

Bidets are substantially better for the environment than toilet paper. Manufacturing one roll of toilet paper requires roughly 37 gallons of water and 0.014 trees. A bidet uses about 0.13 gallons per wash. Switching to a bidet can eliminate 75 to 80 percent of a household's paper use and save dozens of trees over a lifetime.

The environmental case for bidets is compelling once you understand where toilet paper's true cost sits. Most people assume paper is simple and water-based cleaning is wasteful, but that intuition is backwards. The water embedded in manufacturing a single roll of toilet paper far exceeds what a bidet uses to wash dozens of times. The argument is not that bidets are zero-impact but that they shift the impact toward the far lighter end of the scale.

This guide draws on published data from the EPA WaterSense program, Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) reports, Pacific Institute lifecycle analyses, and manufacturer specifications from TOTO, Kohler, American Standard, Woodbridge, Swiss Madison and Brondell. We do not perform independent lab testing; we compare published figures, industry research and peer-reviewed lifecycle analyses. If you are also weighing which toilet to pair with a bidet seat, our pillar on the best flushing toilets covers flush performance and water efficiency side by side.

How much water does toilet paper actually consume?

Producing one standard roll of toilet paper requires approximately 37 gallons (140 liters) of water, according to Pacific Institute lifecycle analysis data. That figure covers pulping, bleaching, rinsing and manufacturing. Over a year, an average American household that uses roughly 100 rolls consumes the equivalent of 3,700 gallons of embedded water in toilet paper alone, before a single gallon of tap water is added.

This embedded or "virtual" water is often invisible to consumers because it does not flow from their tap. But it is real water drawn from rivers, aquifers and municipal systems at the mill, and in water-stressed regions those withdrawals contribute directly to local scarcity. EPA WaterSense focuses on direct household water use, but lifecycle water footprints capture the fuller picture that bidet-versus-paper comparisons require.

Expert Take

Lifecycle water footprint analysis consistently shows that the water savings from switching to a bidet dwarf the water used by the bidet itself. A bidet wash uses roughly 0.1 to 0.13 gallons of tap water. A roll of toilet paper embeds 37 gallons in its manufacture. Even if a bidet-user still uses a few squares of paper to pat dry, the net water reduction per toilet visit is enormous. The critical variable is how much paper you actually eliminate, not whether the bidet uses some water.

How many trees does a bidet save?

The commonly cited figure is that one tree yields approximately 100 rolls of toilet paper. The average American uses 100 rolls per year, meaning one person's paper habit consumes roughly one tree annually. A household of four uses around four trees per year for toilet paper alone. Switching to a bidet and eliminating 75 to 80 percent of paper use saves approximately three trees per household per year.

Most commercial toilet paper in the United States is not made from recycled content. The NRDC's "The Issue with Tissue" report found that major brands including those sold under Charmin, Cottonelle and Angel Soft labels source pulp primarily from Canadian boreal forests, which are critical carbon sinks. Shifting demand away from virgin pulp, even partially, reduces pressure on those forests. Bidet users who switch to recycled-content paper for the small amount they still use compound the environmental benefit.

Metric Toilet Paper (per roll) Bidet (per wash) Annual Household (4 people)
Water used 37 gallons embedded 0.13 gallons direct TP: ~14,800 gal vs bidet: ~190 gal
Trees consumed 0.014 trees per roll Zero TP: ~4 trees vs bidet: 0
Carbon footprint ~0.11 lb CO2e per roll ~0.003 lb CO2e per wash (electricity) TP: ~44 lb CO2e vs bidet: ~4 lb CO2e
Wastewater load Paper solids in sewer Water only Bidet reduces solids load
Packaging waste Plastic wrap per pack None recurring Bidet eliminates ongoing packaging

Sources: Pacific Institute, NRDC Issue with Tissue report, EPA WaterSense, manufacturer specifications. Household assumes 400 rolls/year reduced by 75% with bidet use.

Does a bidet waste more water than it saves?

No. A bidet attachment or bidet seat uses approximately 0.1 to 0.13 gallons (roughly half a liter) of tap water per wash cycle, based on published flow rates from manufacturers including TOTO, Brondell and Bio Bidet. Even over 1,500 washes per year for a household of four, that is about 195 gallons of direct water use. The 37 gallons embedded in each roll of toilet paper means a single roll costs more water than 280 bidet washes.

The net calculation is straightforward: if a bidet eliminates 300 rolls of toilet paper for a household per year, it avoids 11,100 gallons of embedded production water while adding only 195 gallons of tap water. That is a net saving of roughly 10,900 gallons per year for one household.

Expert Take

The "bidets waste water" objection confuses direct tap use with total lifecycle water consumption. Toilet paper's embedded water cost is so high that even a daily bidet user who keeps a few sheets of paper for drying comes out well ahead on total water impact. The math only tilts the other direction if someone simultaneously runs extremely long wash cycles and barely reduces their paper use, which contradicts how bidets are actually used.

What is the carbon footprint of a bidet versus toilet paper?

Producing a roll of toilet paper generates approximately 0.1 to 0.12 pounds of CO2-equivalent emissions, accounting for logging, transportation, pulping, bleaching, packaging and delivery. An American household using 400 rolls per year generates roughly 44 to 48 pounds of CO2e from paper alone. An electric bidet seat, by contrast, consumes approximately 20 to 45 watts for the heated seat and 1,000 to 1,200 watts during active wash cycles that last under a minute, translating to roughly 40 to 80 kWh per year depending on feature use and climate.

At the average U.S. grid carbon intensity of about 0.386 kg CO2 per kWh, a bidet seat adds roughly 7 to 14 kg (15 to 31 pounds) of CO2e per year from electricity. But if it eliminates 300 rolls of paper, it avoids 33 to 36 pounds of paper-related CO2e. On net, even with the electricity draw, an electric bidet seat reduces a household's toilet-related carbon footprint by 2 to 20 pounds per year depending on grid carbon intensity, paper use eliminated and feature settings. Non-electric bidet attachments add essentially zero carbon beyond their one-time manufacturing footprint.

How does bidet water use affect wastewater treatment?

Bidet rinse water enters the sewer as lightly soiled gray water and adds a small volume to municipal wastewater flow, typically under 0.2 gallons per flush event. That incremental load is well within the design capacity of modern treatment systems and does not raise treatment costs in any meaningful way. Toilet paper, by contrast, adds dissolved solids, fiber and bleaching chemicals that must be removed during the treatment process.

Wastewater treatment plants report that paper contributes to sludge volume, which must be processed, dried and disposed of. Reducing paper load through bidet use marginally lowers sludge output and treatment chemical demand over large populations. The wastewater effect of widespread bidet adoption would be slightly lower solids loading, not higher treatment burden.

Expert Take

Wastewater treatment engineers look at biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and total suspended solids (TSS) when assessing load. Toilet paper fiber raises both metrics. Bidet wash water, being essentially clean water with trace biological content, adds volume but not significant BOD or TSS. At scale, a city where half the households used bidets would see a modest but measurable reduction in solids loading at the treatment plant.

Which bidet types have the lowest environmental impact?

Non-electric bidet attachments have the lowest environmental impact because they use no electricity, add no manufacturing footprint beyond a small metal-and-plastic fitting, and use only as much water as a standard wash cycle requires. They eliminate nearly as much toilet paper as electric models. Electric bidet seats have a higher manufacturing footprint and ongoing electricity draw, but they still come out well ahead of toilet-paper-only use when you account for the paper they eliminate.

Among electric models, instant-heating designs like those found in the TOTO Washlet C5 and S550e are more efficient than tank-heating designs because they do not maintain a reservoir of heated water between uses. A non-electric attachment like the Tushy Classic 3.0 or the Luxe Bidet Neo 320 has virtually no ongoing environmental footprint beyond its water use and is the cleanest option for environmentally motivated buyers.

The environmental hierarchy from best to worst for bidet type is roughly: non-electric attachment, electric instant-heat seat, electric tank-heat seat. All three are substantially better than toilet paper alone. The choice between them should be driven by comfort preferences (warm water vs. cold) and outlet availability rather than environmental considerations, because the gap between any bidet type and toilet-paper-only use dwarfs the gap among bidet types.

If you are also evaluating the toilet you pair with a bidet seat, see our guide to EPA WaterSense certified toilets and our comparison of dual flush water savings. A WaterSense-certified toilet using 1.28 GPF or less combined with a bidet seat creates one of the lowest-impact bathroom configurations available without renovation. For a complete look at toilet water efficiency, the how much water does a toilet use guide covers flush volume across every major platform.

How much toilet paper does a bidet actually eliminate?

Survey data and owner reports consistently show that bidet users reduce their toilet paper consumption by 70 to 80 percent. Some users eliminate paper almost entirely and pat dry with a small dedicated towel, reducing paper use to near zero. Most bidet users retain a few sheets of paper for drying, which is where the 20 to 30 percent residual use comes from. The reduction is higher when the bidet has a warm-air dryer, as found in the TOTO Washlet models and Bio Bidet BB-600.

At 75 percent reduction for a four-person household using 400 rolls per year, a bidet saves 300 rolls annually. Over a ten-year product lifespan, that is 3,000 rolls not manufactured, equaling roughly 30 trees not cut, 111,000 gallons of production water not consumed, and approximately 330 pounds of CO2e not emitted from paper production alone.

Expert Take

The 75 percent figure is conservative. Bidet users with heated dryers report using paper primarily for contingency rather than routine drying. If you factor in the carbon avoided from not shipping heavy paper products across the country and not wrapping them in plastic, the per-roll impact is even higher than the production-only figure suggests. A household that switches to a bidet and completes the switch by buying recycled-content paper for the remaining 25 percent can cut its toilet paper environmental footprint by over 85 percent.

Does manufacturing a bidet offset its environmental savings?

No, in nearly all cases the manufacturing footprint of a bidet is paid back within the first year of use through avoided paper production. A basic non-electric bidet attachment weighs under two pounds and is largely metal and plastic, with a manufacturing carbon footprint estimated at under 10 pounds of CO2e. A household avoiding 300 rolls of toilet paper in the first year avoids roughly 33 pounds of CO2e from paper production, paying off the attachment's manufacturing footprint about three times over in year one alone.

Electric bidet seats have a higher manufacturing footprint because of their electronics, motors and heating elements, but even a full electric seat rated at roughly 100 to 150 pounds of CO2e manufacturing footprint is paid back in two to five years of paper use avoided. Given that quality bidet seats from TOTO, Kohler and Brondell carry five to ten year warranties and regularly last longer, the lifetime environmental ROI is strongly positive.

What about flushable wipes compared to bidets?

Flushable wipes are marketed as an alternative to toilet paper that cleans more thoroughly, but they are substantially worse for the environment than either standard toilet paper or bidets. Most "flushable" wipes contain polyester or other synthetic fibers that do not break down in sewer systems. They contribute to fatbergs, block sewer lines, and pass through wastewater treatment largely intact, ending up in waterways or landfill. Wastewater utilities in the United States and United Kingdom have documented the damage flushable wipes cause to pump stations and treatment equipment.

From a water and tree perspective, wipes carry the same embedded production water cost as toilet paper per unit of paper content, plus the additional impact of synthetic fibers that never biodegrade. A bidet eliminates the need for wipes entirely by providing a more thorough rinse than any paper or fiber product. If you have been using wipes for cleanliness reasons, a bidet with a quality spray pattern addresses that need without the downstream environmental damage. See our related guide on what not to flush for the full impact of wipes on plumbing and wastewater systems.

Expert Take

Flushable wipes are the worst outcome in the bidet-versus-paper comparison because they combine paper's embedded water and tree costs with plastic-fiber pollution that lasts indefinitely in the environment. From a pure environmental standpoint, the hierarchy is clear: bidet-only and air-dry is best, bidet plus recycled paper for drying is second, standard toilet paper is third, and flushable wipes are last by a wide margin. No amount of "flushable" certification changes the fact that the fibers persist in waterways.

Recycled toilet paper versus virgin pulp: does it matter if you keep using paper?

For bidet users who still use paper to pat dry, the choice between recycled and virgin-pulp paper matters more than it does for heavy users, because the percentage of their remaining impact that can be shifted is proportionally larger. Recycled toilet paper uses approximately 30 to 50 percent less water in manufacturing than virgin-pulp paper and avoids the tree harvest entirely for its fiber content. It typically has a higher post-consumer recycled content percentage than recycled paper-towels or napkins.

Brands specifically using recycled or bamboo fiber include Who Gives a Crap, Seventh Generation and Caboo. Bamboo-based toilet paper deserves a separate mention: bamboo is not technically a tree, regrows without replanting, and has a significantly lower land-use impact than boreal forest pulp. For bidet users wanting to minimize their remaining paper footprint, a combination of a non-electric bidet plus bamboo or recycled paper for drying achieves an environmental outcome meaningfully better than either choice alone.

Global perspective: why most of the world does not use toilet paper

Per-capita toilet paper consumption in the United States is the highest in the world at roughly 141 rolls per person per year, compared to 50 to 70 in Europe and under 20 in Japan. Japan's low figure is partly explained by the near-universal adoption of washlet-style bidet seats, which have been standard in Japanese bathrooms since the 1980s. In South Korea, bidet seat adoption has reached over 50 percent of households. The Middle East, South Asia and parts of Southeast Asia use water-based cleaning as a cultural norm regardless of bidet hardware.

Global paper consumption is a North American and Western European phenomenon driven by cultural habit rather than hygiene evidence. If the United States were to shift to bidet use at Japan's rate, the reduction in annual toilet paper consumption would eliminate the need for millions of tons of virgin pulp per year. The NRDC estimated in its Issue with Tissue report that if every American chose recycled or bamboo paper, it would preserve 16 million trees per year and avoid 1.5 million tons of CO2e. Adding bidet adoption on top of that would compound the benefit significantly.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much water does a bidet use per wash?

Most bidet seats and attachments use between 0.1 and 0.13 gallons (roughly 400 to 500 milliliters) per wash cycle. High-end models like the TOTO Washlet S550e and Bio Bidet BB-2000 publish flow rate data in their specifications. Some non-electric attachments tied directly to household pressure can briefly exceed this, but the wash duration of 20 to 60 seconds limits total volume to well under half a liter in most use cases.

How many trees does the average American use for toilet paper per year?

Approximately one tree per person per year, based on the figure of 100 rolls per tree and average U.S. consumption of 100 rolls per person annually. A family of four uses about four trees per year for toilet paper. Those figures apply to virgin-pulp paper; recycled paper does not consume new trees in the same way.

Does a bidet increase my water bill significantly?

No. At 0.13 gallons per wash and 365 uses per year for one person, a bidet adds roughly 47 gallons per year, which is negligible compared to a single toilet flush of 1.28 to 1.6 gallons. Most households see no measurable change in their water bill attributable to bidet use. Toilet flushing, showering and laundry dwarf the bidet's water contribution.

Are non-electric bidets better for the environment than electric bidet seats?

Yes, because they have no ongoing electricity draw and a minimal manufacturing footprint. A non-electric attachment like the Tushy Classic 3.0 or Luxe Bidet Neo 320 eliminates nearly as much toilet paper as an electric seat and adds essentially zero electricity consumption. The tradeoff is comfort: cold water is less pleasant, especially in winter, and there is no heated seat or dryer.

Does a bidet's electricity use offset its environmental benefit?

No, it does not offset the benefit, though it does reduce it slightly. An electric bidet seat adds roughly 40 to 80 kWh per year of electricity consumption, generating 15 to 30 pounds of CO2e at average U.S. grid intensity. The paper it eliminates avoids 30 to 40 pounds of CO2e from paper production alone, so the net carbon savings remain positive even for electric models.

What percentage of toilet paper use does a bidet eliminate?

Survey data and owner-review patterns consistently show 70 to 80 percent reduction. Users with a heated dryer, as found on TOTO Washlet models and the Brondell Swash 1400, report higher elimination rates because drying does not require paper at all. Users without a dryer typically retain a few sheets for patting dry.

Is the water used in making toilet paper really 37 gallons per roll?

The 37-gallon figure comes from Pacific Institute and similar lifecycle analysis researchers and covers the full production process including pulping, bleaching, rinsing, and cooling at the mill. Different analyses have produced figures ranging from 17 to 37 gallons depending on whether they include all supply-chain water or only direct mill water. Even at the lower end, one roll of toilet paper consumes far more water to manufacture than a bidet uses to wash dozens of times.

How do bidets compare to wet wipes environmentally?

Bidets are dramatically better than wet wipes. Most wet wipes contain polyester or polypropylene fibers that do not biodegrade, clog sewer systems, and persist in waterways. They also carry the same embedded production water cost as toilet paper per unit of fiber content. A bidet eliminates the need for wipes entirely and has none of the downstream plastic pollution.

Does toilet paper production harm forests in the United States?

Most commercial toilet paper sold in the United States uses pulp sourced from Canadian boreal forests rather than U.S. domestic forests. The NRDC's Issue with Tissue report identified boreal Canada as the primary sourcing region for brands including Charmin, Cottonelle and Quilted Northern. Boreal forests are significant carbon sinks, and logging them for single-use paper products represents an outsized carbon impact relative to the paper's short use life.

What is the carbon footprint of one roll of toilet paper?

Estimates vary, but a commonly cited range is 0.09 to 0.12 pounds of CO2-equivalent per roll when accounting for logging, transportation, manufacturing and packaging. At 400 rolls per year for a household of four, that is 36 to 48 pounds of CO2e annually from toilet paper alone, roughly equivalent to driving 40 to 55 miles in an average gasoline car.

Does switching to bamboo toilet paper have a similar impact to using a bidet?

Bamboo paper significantly reduces tree consumption and has a lower land-use footprint, but it still requires manufacturing water and transportation energy. It does not reduce paper volume used. A bidet reducing paper use by 75 percent combined with bamboo paper for the remaining 25 percent is better than bamboo-only paper for all uses, because the bidet addresses the volume problem while bamboo addresses the material problem.

Are EPA WaterSense certified bidets available?

EPA WaterSense currently certifies toilets, showerheads and faucets but does not have a specific certification program for bidet seats or attachments. However, bidet manufacturers like TOTO publish flow rate data for their Washlet models, and the volumes are so small that formal certification adds little additional assurance. The meaningful water savings from a bidet come from the paper manufacturing water avoided, not from certifying the rinse cycle itself.

How much money does a bidet save on toilet paper per year?

At an average cost of $1 to $1.25 per roll and 75 percent reduction in use, a household of four saving 300 rolls per year saves roughly $300 to $375 annually on toilet paper. Over the three to five year payback period for a quality bidet seat, most households come out well ahead on the financial math even before factoring in environmental impact.

Do bidet seats affect toilet flushing performance?

No, a bidet seat replaces the toilet seat only and does not change the flush valve, trapway or tank mechanism. A TOTO Drake II, Kohler Cimarron, American Standard Champion 4 or any other toilet flushes identically with or without a bidet seat. The bidet connects to the water supply line and requires a nearby GFCI outlet for electric models, but it does not interact with the flush system.

What happens to the rinse water from a bidet?

Bidet rinse water drains directly into the toilet bowl and is flushed with the toilet's normal flush cycle. It enters the municipal sewer or septic system as lightly soiled gray water. The volume is small enough that it does not require a separate flush; most users simply flush once as they normally would, and the bidet rinse water goes with it.

Can a bidet work with a septic system?

Yes, and in many cases a bidet improves septic system performance by reducing the volume of paper solids entering the tank. Septic tanks require periodic pumping partly because paper fibers accumulate as sludge. Reducing paper use by 75 percent means slower sludge accumulation and potentially longer intervals between pump-outs, which is both an environmental and a financial benefit.

Is there an environmental downside to bidets I should know about?

The main environmental costs of bidets are their manufacturing footprint (plastic, metal, electronics for electric models) and electricity consumption for electric models. Both are small relative to the paper production impact they offset. The manufacturing footprint is typically paid back within the first year of paper reduction. Electricity consumption adds a few dozen pounds of CO2e per year, which is less than the paper it displaces. There is no credible lifecycle analysis showing toilet paper outperforms bidets on environmental metrics.

How many rolls of toilet paper does the average American use per year?

Approximately 100 rolls per person per year, the highest per-capita consumption in the world. The United States accounts for about 20 percent of global toilet paper consumption with about 4 percent of global population. High-quality two-ply and three-ply papers use more fiber per roll than single-ply, so actual fiber consumption is higher than the roll count suggests. These figures are from industry trade data and environmental analyses including the NRDC's Issue with Tissue report.

Does using a bidet require using toilet paper afterward?

No, though many users choose to use a few sheets of paper to pat dry after washing. Bidet seats with a warm-air dryer, including models like the TOTO Washlet C200, S500e and S550e and the Bio Bidet BB-2000, allow completely paper-free use. Non-electric models without a dryer leave users to air-dry, pat dry with a small towel, or use a few squares of paper. Either way, paper use drops by at least 70 percent from a pre-bidet baseline.

What bidet attachment should I buy for the best environmental impact?

A non-electric cold-water attachment is the best option for pure environmental impact because it adds no electricity consumption and has a minimal manufacturing footprint. The Tushy Classic 3.0 and Luxe Bidet Neo 320 are well-reviewed options that install in minutes and eliminate 70 to 75 percent of paper use. If warm water is important for comfort, connecting a non-electric attachment to the hot-water supply line under the sink (on sinks close enough to the toilet) avoids the electricity cost of an electric model while improving the wash experience in cold climates.

Sources

  • EPA WaterSense, epa.gov/watersense
  • NRDC "The Issue with Tissue: How Americans Are Flushing Forests Down the Toilet", nrdc.org
  • Pacific Institute, Lifecycle Analysis of Toilet Paper Water Footprint, pacinst.org
  • MaP flush testing, map-testing.com
  • TOTO USA published Washlet specifications, totousa.com
  • Brondell product specifications, brondell.com
  • Bio Bidet product specifications, biobidet.com
  • Manufacturer published specifications (Kohler, American Standard, Woodbridge, Swiss Madison)
  • U.S. Energy Information Administration grid carbon intensity data, eia.gov

Our Verdict

The environmental case for bidets is strong and well-supported by lifecycle data. One roll of toilet paper embeds roughly 37 gallons of manufacturing water and costs about 0.014 trees. A bidet wash uses 0.13 gallons of direct tap water and harms no trees. A household of four switching to a bidet can save roughly 300 rolls of paper per year, avoid the equivalent of three trees annually, and reduce toilet-related water consumption by over 10,000 gallons per year on a net lifecycle basis. Non-electric attachments offer the highest environmental return with zero electricity draw. Electric bidet seats with instant heating, like those from TOTO and Brondell, add modest electricity consumption but remain well ahead of paper-only use. Combining a bidet with an EPA WaterSense certified toilet and recycled or bamboo paper for any remaining drying needs creates one of the most environmentally responsible bathroom configurations available without a full renovation.

How we rank & our data sources

We do not run physical lab tests. Rankings are built from published, verifiable data and real owner feedback, never paid placement.

Researched by Marcus Bell · Last updated April 18, 2026 · Our review method

M
Researched by Marcus Bell

Marcus compiles bathroom-fixture data, MaP flush scores, GPF ratings, trapway and flush-valve specs, and weighs them against thousands of verified owner reviews to build our rankings. He does not run physical lab tests; every verdict is sourced from published specifications, certifications (MaP, EPA WaterSense) and real owner feedback.

Updated April 2026 · Bidets
Keep reading

Related guides

Common Bidets Problems and How to Fix Them (2026)

Bidets
4.6

Step-by-step fixes for the bidet problems reported most often, from a unit that won't spray and weak water pressure to a seat…

Read the guide

How to Choose a Bidets: Complete Buying Guide (2026)

Bidets
4.6

A step-by-step framework for picking the right bidet type, features, and fit based on your toilet, your bathroom's electrical access, and how…

Read the guide
Best Luxury Bidets (2026)

Best Luxury Bidets (2026)

Bidets
4.6

A luxury bidet is judged on a different set of criteria than a standard seat: automatic lid function, a full remote-controlled preset…

Read the guide