We earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you. This never influences our rankings.
2026 Model Comparison

TOTO UltraMax II vs Aquia IV

An honest, spec-by-spec comparison of two of TOTO's most popular toilets, the one-piece UltraMax II and the two-piece dual-flush Aquia IV, using published MaP flush-test scores, EPA WaterSense listings, flush technology, gallons-per-flush ratings, bowl heights and aggregated owner reviews, so you can decide which TOTO fits your bathroom, your water bill and your style.

Why Trust Best Flushing Toilets

  • Flushing power and MaP flush-test scores
  • Water efficiency (GPF and EPA WaterSense)
  • Aggregated owner reviews
  • Clog resistance and trapway design
  • Brand reliability and warranty

Research updated June 2026.

Quick Answer

For a clean one-piece look and a powerful, simple single-flush experience, the TOTO UltraMax II wins. Its Double Cyclone flush, 1.28 GPF and skirted seamless design make it the easiest TOTO to clean and a reliable everyday performer. Choose the Aquia IV instead if you want dual-flush water savings, a lower price, and a WASHLET-ready two-piece that sips as little as 0.8 gallons on the light flush.

The TOTO UltraMax II and the Aquia IV are two of the toilets buyers cross-shop most often inside TOTO's mainstream lineup, and the reason is that they hit a similar price band while taking very different approaches to the same job. Both are 1.28-gallon WaterSense-eligible models built for ordinary bathrooms, both carry TOTO's CeFiONtect ceramic glaze and Universal Height bowls, and both wear the reliability reputation that makes TOTO a default recommendation. If you have narrowed your search to these two, you are not choosing between a good toilet and a weak one. You are choosing between TOTO's clean one-piece single-flush workhorse and its versatile two-piece dual-flush water saver.

The differences are real but specific. The UltraMax II is a one-piece, single-flush toilet engineered around a seamless skirted body that is easy to wipe down and a Double Cyclone flush that clears the bowl with a tight, efficient sweep. The Aquia IV is a two-piece, dual-flush toilet engineered around flexibility, with a 0.8 and 1.28 gallon button, a Dynamax Tornado flush and full compatibility with TOTO's WASHLET bidet seats. That single design philosophy ripples into water use, cleaning, price, install and style. This guide compares them head to head using published manufacturer specifications, MaP (Maximum Performance) flush-test gram scores, EPA WaterSense listings, flush valve and flush technology details, bowl heights and shapes, and aggregated owner ratings. For the broadest cross-brand ranking of flush strength, the pillar guide to the best flushing toilets covers TOTO alongside Kohler, American Standard and the rest. This page stays focused on the choice between these two TOTO lines.

How we research and compare

We do not test toilets in a lab. We compare manufacturer specifications, published MaP flush-test gram scores, EPA WaterSense listings, flush technology and valve details, gallons-per-flush ratings, bowl heights and shapes, rough-in dimensions and aggregated owner ratings across major retailers. Where one model clearly suits a use case better, we say so plainly rather than calling a single universal winner.

At a glance

UltraMax II vs Aquia IV compared

A side-by-side look at the two models in their common Universal Height, elongated configurations. Higher MaP grams means more waste cleared per flush, and a lower average GPF means less water down the drain over a year. The tinted cell shows which model tends to lead on that row. Exact figures vary slightly by SKU, so confirm the spec sheet for the specific model number you buy.

Spec TOTO UltraMax II TOTO Aquia IV
Full flush MaP score 800 g 800 g
Flush technology Double Cyclone Dynamax Tornado
Flush type Single 1.28 GPF Dual 0.8 / 1.28
Design One piece, skirted Two piece, skirted
Average water use 1.28 gal per flush ~1.0 gal effective
Ceramic glaze CeFiONtect CeFiONtect
Bowl height Universal (comfort) Universal (comfort)
WASHLET bidet ready Yes (standard connection) Yes (WASHLET+ ready)
WaterSense certified Yes Yes
Cleaning ease Seamless one-piece Tank seam to wipe
Typical owner rating 4.7 4.6

Which TOTO toilet has the stronger flush?

The UltraMax II and the Aquia IV are effectively matched on flush strength, with both posting around an 800-gram MaP score on the full flush. The UltraMax II uses TOTO's Double Cyclone system, while the Aquia IV uses the Dynamax Tornado flush, and both clear a heavy household load in a single push. The Aquia IV's lighter 0.8-gallon button is meant for liquid waste only and is not the flush you measure for clearing power.

Flushing power is measured most reliably by the independent MaP (Maximum Performance) test, which reports how many grams of solid waste a toilet clears in a single flush. Both of these TOTO models land in the same strong territory, around 800 grams on the full flush, which is comfortably above the 350-gram WaterSense minimum and well past what an average household produces in one flush. The difference is in how each one moves the water, not in the headline number.

The UltraMax II uses TOTO's Double Cyclone system, which feeds water through two angled nozzles instead of conventional rim holes, creating a centrifugal rinsing action that uses the full 1.28 gallons efficiently to sweep the bowl. The Aquia IV uses the newer Dynamax Tornado flush, which uses three nozzles to spin water around the bowl in a powerful swirl that improves rim coverage and bowl cleanliness. On paper the Tornado system has a slight edge in rinse coverage, which is why it earns the tinted cell on flush technology, but in terms of raw waste-clearing grams the two are practically even. Either toilet clears a normal load in one flush without drama.

Which TOTO toilet uses less water?

The Aquia IV uses less water overall because it is a dual-flush toilet, offering a 0.8-gallon light flush for liquid waste and a 1.28-gallon full flush for solids. In a typical household the effective average lands near 1.0 gallon per flush, below the UltraMax II's fixed 1.28 gallons. Both are EPA WaterSense certified, but the Aquia IV is the more water-efficient choice for buyers focused on the utility bill.

This is where the two toilets genuinely diverge. The UltraMax II is a single-flush toilet that uses a fixed 1.28 gallons every time you flush, which already beats the old 1.6-gallon federal maximum by 20 percent and earns it EPA WaterSense certification. For most homes that is plenty efficient, and the simplicity of a single lever has real appeal because there is nothing to think about and nothing for a guest to get wrong.

The Aquia IV is a dual-flush toilet with a two-button actuator on top of the tank. The light flush uses just 0.8 gallons and is meant for liquid waste, while the full flush uses 1.28 gallons for solids. Because most flushes in a typical home are liquid-only, the Aquia IV's effective average water use settles near 1.0 gallon per flush, which is meaningfully lower than the UltraMax II's flat 1.28. Over a year and across a busy household, that gap adds up on the water bill and can qualify for the same local utility rebates as any WaterSense toilet. If trimming water use is high on your list, the Aquia IV is the clear pick. For the full list of certified options across all brands, see our roundup of the best EPA WaterSense certified toilets.

Tip: dual-flush saves water only if everyone uses it right

The Aquia IV's water savings depend on people pressing the small light-flush button for liquid waste. In a home full of guests, kids, or anyone who habitually mashes the big button, the real-world average creeps back up toward 1.28 gallons. If you know your household will use the two buttons correctly, the dual flush pays off. If you suspect everyone will hit full flush every time, the simpler single-flush UltraMax II loses nothing.

Which TOTO toilet is easier to clean?

The UltraMax II is easier to clean because it is a one-piece toilet with no seam between the tank and bowl, so there is no crevice to trap dust and grime. Its fully skirted base also hides the trapway for a smooth wipe-down. The Aquia IV is a skirted two-piece, which is cleaner than a traditional exposed-trapway design but still has a tank-to-bowl joint that the seamless UltraMax II avoids.

Cleaning is one of the strongest reasons buyers choose a one-piece toilet, and the UltraMax II is exactly that. Because the tank and bowl are molded as a single seamless unit, there is no gap between them where dust, hair and cleaning residue collect, and no awkward seam to scrub. Its fully skirted base hides the trapway contours that catch grime on conventional toilets, leaving a smooth outer surface you can wipe in seconds. Both toilets also carry TOTO's CeFiONtect glaze, an ultra-smooth ceramic finish that prevents particles and bacteria from adhering, so the bowl itself stays cleaner with less scrubbing on either model.

The Aquia IV is a skirted two-piece, which is a genuinely clean design by two-piece standards because its sides are smooth and the trapway is concealed. The one cleaning compromise is the tank-to-bowl seam, the joint where the separate tank meets the bowl, which is the spot most buyers think about when they picture wiping down a two-piece toilet. It is a minor difference in practice, but if effortless cleaning is a top priority, the seamless UltraMax II has the edge. For more on this trade-off across the catalog, our guide to one-piece vs two-piece toilets walks through the cleaning, price and install differences in detail.

Which TOTO toilet offers the best value?

The Aquia IV usually offers the better value. As a two-piece toilet it typically costs less than the one-piece UltraMax II, while still delivering an 800-gram flush, dual-flush water savings and WASHLET+ readiness. The UltraMax II is worth its premium when a seamless one-piece look and the simplicity of single-flush operation matter more to you than the lowest price.

On value, the Aquia IV is usually the winner. Two-piece toilets are generally less expensive to manufacture and ship than one-piece models, and the Aquia IV follows that pattern, typically landing below the UltraMax II on price while still delivering a strong 800-gram flush, dual-flush efficiency and TOTO's reliability. Add in the WASHLET+ design that conceals supply and power connections for a clean bidet upgrade later, and the Aquia IV gives you more flexibility per dollar. For a guest bathroom, a remodel on a budget, or any buyer who wants TOTO quality without paying the one-piece premium, it is hard to beat.

The UltraMax II costs more, and the premium buys the seamless one-piece body, the easiest cleaning of the two and the clean, modern silhouette that one-piece toilets are prized for. For a primary bathroom where look and effortless maintenance matter, many feel the step up is worth it. The choice is less about flush performance, since the two are nearly even there, and more about whether the one-piece styling and single-flush simplicity are worth the extra cost to you. We never quote prices here because they shift constantly, so check the current price on Amazon for the exact model and configuration you are considering.

Tip: confirm your rough-in before you buy either one

Both the UltraMax II and the Aquia IV are built for a standard 12-inch rough-in, the distance from the finished wall behind the toilet to the center of the floor drain. Measure from the finished wall to the center of the bolt caps at the floor before ordering. Also confirm the bowl shape, since both come in elongated and, on select SKUs, round-front versions. Getting the rough-in wrong causes more returns than any flush spec ever will.

What is a good MaP score for a toilet?

A MaP score of 600 grams handles a typical household, 800 grams is strong, and 1,000 grams is the practical ceiling. Both the UltraMax II and the Aquia IV land around 800 grams on the full flush, which clears a heavy normal load with margin to spare. Anything above the 350-gram EPA WaterSense minimum flushes an average load, so both TOTO models clear far more than most homes ever demand.

The MaP test was created to give buyers an objective, repeatable measure of flush strength instead of relying on marketing claims. It loads a toilet with a measured weight of test media and reports the maximum grams cleared in a single flush. WaterSense requires at least 350 grams to certify, which is the floor for an acceptable flush. In practice, anything from 600 grams upward handles a normal household with ease, 800 grams is genuinely strong, and 1,000 grams is the practical ceiling that the very best toilets reach.

Against that scale, both of these TOTO toilets are strong performers. Their roughly 800-gram full-flush scores clear a heavy load with margin to spare, which is well past what an average household produces in a single flush. The honest takeaway is that neither model will leave you disappointed on flush strength, so you should choose between them on the things that actually differ: water savings, cleaning, price and style. Both deliver the dependable single-flush clearing that has made TOTO a benchmark brand. For models that push to the 1,000-gram ceiling, see our roundup of the best 1,000-gram MaP toilets.

Expert Take

When a buyer asks me to choose between these two, the deciding question is almost never flush power, because they are even there. It comes down to two preferences. First, do you want the lowest water use and the lower price, or the cleanest look and the simplest operation. If it is savings and budget, the Aquia IV's dual flush and two-piece price win. Second, are you planning a bidet seat down the road. If a WASHLET is in your future, the Aquia IV's WASHLET+ design hides the connections for a far tidier install. If you just want a clean, easy-to-wipe one-piece that flushes hard with one lever and never makes you think about it, the UltraMax II is the one I point people toward.

Which TOTO toilet is better for a bidet seat?

The Aquia IV is the better base for a bidet because it is sold in a WASHLET+ configuration designed to conceal the water supply and electrical cord when paired with a compatible TOTO WASHLET seat. The UltraMax II accepts a standard bidet seat too, but its connections are not hidden the same way. If a clean, integrated bidet upgrade matters, the Aquia IV is built for it.

Bidet seats have become a major reason buyers choose TOTO specifically, since TOTO's WASHLET line is the most recognized in the category. Both of these toilets can take a bidet seat, but the Aquia IV is the one engineered around it. The WASHLET+ version of the Aquia IV is designed so that when you mount a matching TOTO WASHLET, the supply line and the power cord route discreetly behind the unit instead of dangling in view, giving you the clean, built-in look of an integrated smart toilet at a fraction of the cost. If you know a bidet seat is coming, buying the WASHLET+ Aquia IV from the start saves you a messier retrofit later.

The UltraMax II will accept a standard electric or non-electric bidet seat as well, since it uses a normal bowl mounting pattern, so you are not locked out of a bidet by choosing it. The difference is purely how tidy the finished installation looks, with the Aquia IV WASHLET+ hiding connections that remain visible on a standard UltraMax II install. If a bidet is not in your plans, this difference does not matter and you can weigh the two on price, water use and style instead. For a broader look at pairing toilets with bidet seats, our guide to the best bidet toilet seats covers compatibility and features.

How do height, comfort and dimensions compare?

Both the UltraMax II and the Aquia IV use TOTO's Universal Height, which places the seat near chair height for easier sitting and standing, and both come in elongated bowls for roomy comfort. Both are built for a standard 12-inch rough-in. The main physical difference is form: the UltraMax II is a lower, sleeker one-piece silhouette, while the Aquia IV is a taller-tanked two-piece.

Both toilets use TOTO's Universal Height, which puts the seat at roughly chair height (around 17 to 17.25 inches to the seat with the lid). Comfort-height bowls are easier to sit down on and stand up from, which is why they are the default recommendation for taller adults, older users and anyone with knee or hip concerns. Because both lines share this height, your choice between the UltraMax II and the Aquia IV does not force a trade on comfort, and both come in elongated bowls, the roomier and more popular shape for most bathrooms.

Both are designed for a standard 12-inch rough-in and use a normal supply connection. The clearest physical difference is the overall form. The UltraMax II's one-piece construction gives it a lower, continuous, modern profile with a tank that flows seamlessly into the bowl, which many buyers prefer visually and which fits compact or contemporary bathrooms well. The Aquia IV is a two-piece with a separate tank, so it has a slightly taller, more traditional tank line and the familiar two-piece silhouette. Both are skirted, so both hide the trapway for a clean side profile. If a low, sleek look is part of what you are buying, the UltraMax II delivers it; if you do not mind the standard two-piece form, the Aquia IV gives you the same Universal Height comfort for less.

How do the UltraMax II and Aquia IV fit the wider brand picture?

The UltraMax II is TOTO's clean one-piece single-flush workhorse, while the Aquia IV is its versatile two-piece dual-flush water saver. Both compete well against Kohler's Santa Rosa and Cimarron and American Standard's VorMax models at similar price points. If you want a seamless one-piece, the UltraMax II leads; if you want dual-flush savings and a bidet-ready base, the Aquia IV is the smarter buy.

Neither of these is the only TOTO worth knowing, and neither is your only option in its price range. Within TOTO, the UltraMax II sits alongside the two-piece Drake and Drake II as a single-flush gravity option, while the Aquia IV anchors the dual-flush side of the catalog. If you are weighing TOTO's most popular two-piece against its one-piece flush engine, the TOTO Drake vs UltraMax II comparison covers that pairing directly and explains how the same flush philosophy plays out across body styles.

If you are open to looking beyond TOTO, the same money buys you strong Kohler and American Standard options. Our TOTO vs Kohler comparison weighs TOTO's Tornado and Double Cyclone flushes against Kohler's AquaPiston and Class Five systems, and the Kohler vs American Standard comparison covers those two brands if you want to widen the field further. On the power end, the American Standard Champion 4 vs Cadet 3 comparison shows how a maximum-power gravity toilet compares to a value model, a useful contrast if raw clog-clearing force is your top concern. The pattern across every brand is the same as it is here: decide which features you actually need, then pay for exactly that. Beyond these brands, Woodbridge, Swiss Madison and Gerber also make capable one-piece and dual-flush toilets worth a look if you want more options in the value tier.

Expert Take

The mistake I see most often with this pairing is a buyer paying the one-piece premium for the UltraMax II purely because it looks sleeker, then realizing later they wanted a bidet seat and wishing they had bought the WASHLET+ Aquia IV instead. Think one step ahead. If a bidet is anywhere in your plans, start with the Aquia IV. If you genuinely want the cleanest one-piece look and never intend to add a bidet, the UltraMax II is a beautiful, low-maintenance toilet that flushes hard and wipes clean in seconds. Both are excellent. The right answer is whichever one matches the bathroom you are actually building, not the spec sheet that looks best in isolation.

Choose the TOTO UltraMax II if

The UltraMax II is the right pick when a clean one-piece look and effortless cleaning sit at the top of your list. Choose the UltraMax II if you want a seamless body with no tank-to-bowl seam to scrub, since its molded one-piece construction and fully skirted base make it the easiest of the two to wipe down. Choose it if you prefer the simplicity of a single flush lever, with nothing for a guest to get wrong and a fixed, dependable 1.28-gallon flush every time. Choose it for a primary or guest bathroom where a low, modern silhouette matters and you want TOTO's Double Cyclone flush and CeFiONtect glaze in the tidiest possible package. Accept in return a higher price than the two-piece Aquia IV and the loss of dual-flush water savings. The premium buys a cleaner look and the simplest operation TOTO offers.

Shop it here: check the current price on Amazon for the TOTO UltraMax II.

Choose the TOTO Aquia IV if

The Aquia IV is the right pick when water savings, value and bidet-readiness matter most. Choose the Aquia IV if you want the lowest real-world water use, since its dual-flush button drops to 0.8 gallons for liquid waste and settles near a 1.0-gallon effective average over a busy week. Choose it if you want TOTO quality at a friendlier two-piece price, with the same 800-gram flush and CeFiONtect glaze as the pricier one-piece. Choose it if a WASHLET bidet seat is in your plans, because the WASHLET+ design hides the supply and power connections for a clean, integrated upgrade later. Choose it for a remodel, a guest bath or a water-conscious household where flexibility and dollars-per-flush lead the decision. The Aquia IV gives most buyers more features for less money.

Shop it here: check the current price on Amazon for the TOTO Aquia IV.

The verdict

Bottom line

UltraMax II for the clean look, Aquia IV for the savings

Both toilets are dependable TOTO designs that flush a normal load in one push, carry CeFiONtect glaze and Universal Height comfort, and earn EPA WaterSense certification. They are nearly even on flush strength at around 800 grams MaP, so the choice comes down to form and features. The UltraMax II is the clean one-piece pick: seamless, easiest to wipe down, with a sleek low profile and the simplicity of a single flush. The Aquia IV is the smart value and efficiency pick: a dual-flush two-piece that sips as little as 0.8 gallons, costs less, and is built for a tidy WASHLET bidet upgrade. If a clean look and effortless cleaning lead, pay the premium for the UltraMax II. If savings, price and bidet-readiness lead, the Aquia IV delivers more for less. Neither choice is a mistake. Match the model to your priorities and rough-in, then check the current price on Amazon for the exact configuration before you buy.

Ready to shop? Check the current price on Amazon for the seamless one-piece TOTO UltraMax II or the dual-flush TOTO Aquia IV.

FAQ

UltraMax II vs Aquia IV: common questions

? Which flushes better, the UltraMax II or the Aquia IV?

They are effectively even. Both post around an 800-gram MaP flush-test score on the full flush, which clears a heavy household load in a single push. The UltraMax II uses TOTO's Double Cyclone system and the Aquia IV uses the Dynamax Tornado flush, with the Tornado having a slight edge in rim rinse coverage. Neither will leave you disappointed on flush strength, so choose between them on water use, cleaning and price instead.

? Which TOTO uses less water?

The Aquia IV. As a dual-flush toilet it offers a 0.8-gallon light flush for liquid waste and a 1.28-gallon full flush for solids, so its effective average lands near 1.0 gallon per flush in a typical home. The UltraMax II uses a fixed 1.28 gallons every flush. Both are WaterSense certified, but the Aquia IV is the more water-efficient choice for a busy household.

? Is the UltraMax II worth the extra money over the Aquia IV?

It depends on what you value. The UltraMax II's premium buys a seamless one-piece body that is the easiest of the two to clean and a sleek low profile, plus single-flush simplicity. For a primary bathroom where look and effortless maintenance matter, many feel it is worth it. For buyers focused on water savings, lower price or a bidet upgrade, the two-piece dual-flush Aquia IV delivers more for less. Check the current price on Amazon for both, since pricing shifts constantly.

? Which is easier to clean?

The UltraMax II. As a one-piece toilet it has no seam between the tank and bowl, so there is no crevice to trap dust and grime, and its fully skirted base wipes down in seconds. The Aquia IV is a clean skirted two-piece but still has a tank-to-bowl joint. Both carry CeFiONtect glaze, which keeps the bowl interior cleaner on either model, so the difference is mostly on the exterior.

? Are both toilets WaterSense certified?

Yes. Both the UltraMax II and the Aquia IV are EPA WaterSense certified. The UltraMax II uses 1.28 gallons per flush and the Aquia IV uses 1.28 on the full flush and 0.8 on the light flush, and both qualify for local utility rebates where offered. The Aquia IV's dual flush gives it lower real-world average water use, but both meet WaterSense efficiency standards.

? What is the difference between Double Cyclone and Dynamax Tornado flush?

Both are TOTO rim-jet flush systems that replace conventional rim holes with angled nozzles for a swirling rinse. Double Cyclone, used on the UltraMax II, uses two nozzles to create a centrifugal cleaning action. Dynamax Tornado, used on the Aquia IV, uses three nozzles for a more powerful swirl and slightly better rim coverage. Both clear waste well and keep the bowl cleaner than older rim designs.

? Which is better for adding a bidet seat?

The Aquia IV. It is sold in a WASHLET+ configuration designed to hide the water supply line and power cord when paired with a compatible TOTO WASHLET, giving a clean integrated look. The UltraMax II accepts a standard bidet seat too, but its connections are not concealed the same way. If a bidet is in your plans, start with the WASHLET+ Aquia IV.

? Is the UltraMax II a one-piece or two-piece toilet?

The UltraMax II is a one-piece toilet, meaning the tank and bowl are molded as a single seamless unit. That gives it a sleek low profile and makes it easy to clean since there is no tank-to-bowl seam. The Aquia IV is a two-piece toilet with a separate tank that bolts to the bowl, which lowers its price but adds a seam.

? Do both come in comfort height?

Yes. Both use TOTO's Universal Height, which puts the seat near chair height for easier sitting and standing. This suits taller adults, older users and anyone with knee or hip concerns. Because both share this height, your choice between them does not force a trade on comfort, and both also come in roomy elongated bowls.

? What rough-in do these toilets need?

Both the UltraMax II and the Aquia IV are built for a standard 12-inch rough-in, the distance from the finished wall behind the toilet to the center of the floor drain. Measure from the finished wall to the center of the bolt caps before ordering, since this single spec causes more returns than any flush feature. Confirm the SKU if your home has a 10-inch or 14-inch rough-in.

? Which is easier to install?

The Aquia IV ships as a two-piece, so each part is lighter to carry, but it requires bolting the tank to the bowl during install. The UltraMax II arrives as a single heavier one-piece unit that is more awkward to lift but skips the tank assembly step. Both use a standard 12-inch rough-in and normal supply connection, so the overall difficulty is similar and comes down to whether you prefer a lighter lift or fewer assembly steps.

? Does the Aquia IV's light flush clear solids?

The 0.8-gallon light flush is designed for liquid waste only. For solids you use the 1.28-gallon full flush, which posts the 800-gram MaP score and clears a heavy load in one push. Using the light button for solids can leave residue, so the dual-flush savings come from using the light flush only when appropriate. Most flushes in a home are liquid-only, which is why the average lands near 1.0 gallon.

? Do both use TOTO's CeFiONtect glaze?

Yes. Both the UltraMax II and the Aquia IV carry CeFiONtect, TOTO's ultra-smooth ceramic glaze that prevents particles, mold and bacteria from adhering to the bowl. It keeps the interior cleaner with less scrubbing and helps each flush rinse the bowl more completely. The glaze is identical on both models, so neither has an advantage on bowl cleanliness from the coating itself.

? Which is better for a small bathroom?

The UltraMax II's one-piece form has a lower, more continuous profile that can look less bulky in a tight space, which some buyers prefer visually. Both are elongated and both use a standard rough-in, so neither saves floor space in a meaningful way unless you choose a round-front SKU. For a genuinely tight footprint, look at round-front versions or compact models, since these two are both standard elongated TOTOs.

? How do these compare to Kohler and American Standard toilets?

The UltraMax II competes with Kohler's one-piece Santa Rosa and American Standard's VorMax one-piece models, while the Aquia IV competes with Kohler's dual-flush options and American Standard dual-flush lines. TOTO's reputation for reliable flushing and CeFiONtect glaze gives it a strong position in both categories. Our TOTO vs Kohler and Kohler vs American Standard comparisons cover the cross-brand details.

? Which has a better warranty?

Both are backed by TOTO's standard residential warranty, which typically covers the vitreous china and the working mechanical parts for a long term on the body and a shorter period on the components. The exact terms can vary slightly by model and SKU, so check the warranty card for the specific toilet you buy. Neither model has a meaningful warranty advantage over the other within the TOTO lineup.

? Is the Aquia IV's flush as strong as the UltraMax II's?

Yes, on the full flush they are essentially matched, both around 800 grams MaP. The Aquia IV's Dynamax Tornado system actually has a slight edge in rim rinse coverage, while the UltraMax II's Double Cyclone is a proven efficient sweep. The only weaker flush on the Aquia IV is the 0.8-gallon light button, which is intentionally light because it is meant for liquid waste only.

? Are these toilets noisy?

No. Both are gravity-fed TOTO toilets, so they flush with a quiet, smooth sound far softer than a pressure-assisted toilet. The Double Cyclone and Dynamax Tornado systems both move water in a controlled swirl rather than a violent surge, so neither model is loud. For a bedroom-adjacent bathroom, either is a quiet choice, with no meaningful noise difference between them.

? Which should I buy if I am not sure?

If you cannot point to a specific reason to pay for the one-piece, buy the Aquia IV. It costs less, saves more water with its dual flush, flushes just as hard, and is ready for a bidet upgrade. Step up to the UltraMax II only if you specifically want the seamless one-piece look and the easiest possible cleaning. That single question, do you value the cleanest one-piece look or the best value and water savings, settles the choice for most buyers.

Sources

  • EPA WaterSense, epa.gov/watersense
  • MaP (Maximum Performance) flush testing, map-testing.com
  • Manufacturer published specifications (TOTO, Kohler, American Standard)
The verdict

Our Verdict

Our Verdict

The choice between the UltraMax II and the Aquia IV comes down to two honest questions: do you want the cleanest look and simplest operation, or the lowest water use and price, and is a bidet seat in your future. Both are excellent TOTO toilets, nearly even at around 800 grams MaP, sharing CeFiONtect glaze, Universal Height comfort and WaterSense certification. The UltraMax II is the seamless one-piece pick: easiest to wipe down, sleek and low-profile, with a single dependable flush and nothing to think about. The Aquia IV is the value and efficiency pick: a dual-flush two-piece that sips as little as 0.8 gallons, costs less, and is purpose-built for a tidy WASHLET bidet upgrade. If a clean look and effortless cleaning lead your list, the UltraMax II earns its premium. If savings, price and bidet-readiness lead, the Aquia IV delivers more for the money. Buy on the features you actually need, confirm your rough-in, then check the current price on Amazon for the exact configuration before you buy.

H
Researched by Home Fixtures Editor

Home Fixtures Editor. Compares toilet specs, MaP flush-test scores, certifications and aggregated owner reviews. We do not physically test units in a lab.

Updated December 2025 · Comparisons
Keep reading

Related guides

White vs Colored Toilet: Which Holds Its Value?

Comparisons
4.6

A data-driven look at resale impact, long-term availability, and which color choice makes more sense for your bathroom and your budget.

Read the guide

1.28 GPF vs 1.6 GPF Toilet: Water Use and Flush Power

Comparisons
4.6

A complete breakdown of water consumption, flush performance, MaP test scores, EPA WaterSense certification, and real-world clog resistance -- so you can…

Read the guide

H2Option vs Cadet 3: Water Saver vs Workhorse

Comparisons
4.6

A data-driven comparison of two American Standard bestsellers: the dual-flush H2Option and the high-output Cadet 3. Which one belongs in your bathroom?

Read the guide