Toilet Water Moves When Bathtub Drains
PlumbingSee toilet water rippling or dropping while the tub drains? Learn why shared drains and blocked vents cause it, how to diagnose…
Read the guideA data-driven comparison of material cost, longevity, freeze resistance, water quality, and installation complexity to help you choose the right supply pipe for your bathroom remodel or new build.
Research updated June 2026.
PEX wins for most bathroom remodels: it costs 60 to 70 percent less than copper per linear foot, installs faster, resists freeze-bursting, and performs equally well for hot and cold supply lines. Copper remains the better choice where local codes require it, where water quality is aggressive toward plastic, or where UV exposure is unavoidable.
PEX (cross-linked polyethylene) is a flexible plastic tubing introduced to the North American residential market in the 1980s. Cross-linking the polyethylene chains produces a material that handles continuous water pressure up to 160 psi at 73 degrees Fahrenheit (per ASTM F876), bends around framing without fittings, and expands rather than splits when frozen water inside expands. PEX is rated for temperatures from -40 F to 200 F, making it suitable for both cold supply and hot supply lines in bathrooms.
Copper has been the standard residential supply pipe in the United States since the 1950s. Available in Types K, L, and M, copper pipe is a rigid metal that resists UV degradation, does not leach chemicals at normal temperatures, and has a proven 50-plus-year service record. Type M (thin wall) is the grade most commonly installed in residential bathrooms. Copper's natural antimicrobial properties slow bacterial biofilm growth inside the pipe -- a meaningful consideration in a bathroom setting where supply lines can sit stagnant.
PEX tubing typically costs $0.50 to $1.50 per linear foot for materials, while copper Type M runs $3.00 to $8.00 per linear foot depending on commodity prices. Including fittings and labor, a full bathroom rough-in averages $400 to $900 with PEX versus $1,200 to $2,500 with copper, according to contractor cost surveys from HomeAdvisor and Fixr.
Copper pricing fluctuates with global commodity markets. As of mid-2026, copper spot prices remain elevated, keeping the material cost gap wide. PEX pricing is more stable because it is oil-derived and subject to moderate petroleum-market swings rather than metal exchange volatility.
The labor cost gap is just as significant. PEX can be bent by hand around studs, so plumbers run longer continuous lengths with fewer fittings. Fewer fittings means fewer solder joints and fewer potential leak points. A plumber installing PEX in a single bathroom typically uses 40 to 60 percent fewer fittings than the same job in copper, reducing both labor time and consumables.
| Factor | PEX Tubing | Copper (Type M) |
|---|---|---|
| Material cost per linear foot | $0.50 - $1.50 | $3.00 - $8.00 |
| Full bathroom rough-in (materials + labor) | $400 - $900 | $1,200 - $2,500 |
| Typical service life | 25 - 50 years | 50 - 80+ years |
| Freeze-burst resistance | Excellent (expands) | Poor (splits) |
| UV resistance | None (needs covering) | Excellent |
| Antimicrobial properties | None inherent | Yes (natural) |
| Lead-free status | Yes (all PEX types) | Yes (post-2014 fittings) |
| Code acceptance (most US jurisdictions) | Yes (IRC Section P2904) | Yes (universal) |
| Recycle value at end of life | Low | High |
| DIY friendliness | High | Moderate (requires soldering or press tools) |
Copper has the longer published service life -- 50 to 80 years under normal conditions versus 25 to 50 years for PEX per ASTM and manufacturer data. However, PEX longevity is strongly affected by chlorine levels and UV exposure, while copper longevity depends on local water pH and corrosivity. In most municipal-water bathrooms, both materials comfortably outlast typical renovation cycles of 20 to 30 years.
The International Association of Certified Home Inspectors (InterNACHI) publishes expected lifespans of 50-plus years for copper and notes that PEX has a shorter but still substantial track record, given that widespread residential use began only in the 1990s. Independent accelerated-aging studies funded by the Plastic Pipe Institute suggest PEX-A (made with the Engel method) has a projected 50-year life at standard residential water temperatures.
Water chemistry matters more than the pipe material alone. Water with a pH below 6.5 attacks copper directly, causing pinhole leaks -- a well-documented problem in parts of the Mid-Atlantic and Southeast United States. PEX is largely immune to pH-driven corrosion but can degrade when exposed to chloramine concentrations above 4 mg/L over extended periods, an issue more common with well water treated on-site than with regulated municipal supplies.
Plumbing engineers often note that the highest-failure-rate copper installations are in homes built between 1970 and 1990, where thin-wall Type M was used with flux residue left inside joints. Modern copper installations -- properly cleaned, properly fluxed, and properly rinsed -- have dramatically better real-world outcomes. The comparison between copper and PEX should account for installation quality, not just material properties on paper.
All PEX tubing sold in the United States for potable water must meet NSF/ANSI Standard 61 for health effects and NSF/ANSI 372 for lead content. Studies by the Water Research Foundation (WRF Project 4304) found that PEX can leach trace organic compounds into stagnant water, but measured concentrations in flowing water fell well below EPA maximum contaminant levels. For bathroom cold supply lines -- where water moves frequently -- PEX poses no established health risk under current regulatory standards.
The taste concern with PEX is real but context-dependent. New PEX can impart a slight plastic odor to stagnant water. This effect diminishes after several weeks of use and is largely irrelevant for bathroom supply lines feeding toilets, sinks, and showers rather than drinking taps. For a dedicated bathroom drinking faucet or filtered-water dispenser near a bathroom vanity, copper or stainless is a more conservative choice purely on taste grounds.
Copper's antimicrobial advantage is well-documented in peer-reviewed literature. Copper ions inhibit bacterial growth -- including Legionella pneumophila -- inside pipe walls. The WHO and the EPA have acknowledged this property in guidance on Legionella risk management in building water systems. For large commercial or healthcare bathrooms, copper's antimicrobial benefit carries real clinical weight. For a residential bathroom with daily use, Legionella risk in supply lines is considered negligible regardless of pipe material.
PEX expands as water inside freezes and returns to its original diameter as it thaws, generally without bursting. Copper does not expand and splits under ice pressure, often at solder joints. In climates with occasional hard freezes -- or in bathrooms on exterior walls with minimal insulation -- PEX provides a significant practical advantage over copper.
This is not a theoretical difference. The Insurance Institute for Business and Home Safety (IBHS) has documented that frozen pipe bursts are one of the most costly homeowner insurance claims in cold-climate states. Plumbing in exterior bathroom walls, under bathroom additions above unheated garages, or in vacation homes that are occasionally left without heat are high-risk scenarios where PEX's freeze tolerance is a genuine financial and logistical benefit.
PEX's freeze tolerance has limits. The pipe itself survives expansion, but PEX fittings and transition connections to copper or other rigid materials can still fail under extreme freeze pressure. Proper insulation of bathroom supply lines remains the best practice regardless of pipe material, but PEX provides a meaningful safety margin when insulation is imperfect or intermittent heating fails.
Contractors in northern states and high-altitude regions have largely shifted to PEX for bathroom supply lines in new construction specifically because of freeze behavior. The material cost savings are an added benefit; the freeze insurance is the primary driver in climates that regularly see sustained temperatures below 20 degrees Fahrenheit.
PEX is significantly easier to install than copper in most bathroom scenarios. It bends around framing without heat, requires no open flame, and can be fished through existing walls during remodels. Copper requires a torch, flux, solder, and skill to make watertight joints, raising the barrier for DIY work and increasing labor cost for professional installation.
PEX connection methods vary by type. PEX-A (Uponor Wirsbo, Rehau) uses an expansion tool and fitting that creates a compression ring -- widely regarded as the most reliable and highest-flow method. PEX-B (SharkBite, Viega) uses crimp or clamp rings with a separate crimping tool. PEX-C is the least common. SharkBite push-to-connect fittings work with PEX, copper, and CPVC, making transitions between materials simple during partial remodels -- a frequent scenario in older bathrooms where copper supply lines meet a new toilet or shower valve.
Copper soldering requires a propane or MAPP gas torch, which creates fire risk inside wall cavities. The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) attributes hundreds of residential fires annually to plumbing torch work. Many jurisdictions require fire-protection measures (fire-resistant cloth, extinguisher on site) during copper soldering inside walls. PEX connections using expansion, crimp, or push-to-connect methods require no flame, eliminating that risk entirely.
The International Residential Code (IRC), which most US states have adopted in whole or with amendments, permits PEX tubing for interior cold and hot supply lines under Section P2904 and ASTM F876/F877/F2023 standards. Most US jurisdictions accept PEX without restriction for residential bathroom plumbing.
Exceptions exist. Some older city building codes -- particularly in certain municipalities in the Northeast -- still mandate copper or have not updated to the current IRC cycle. Chicago famously prohibited plastic pipe for many years, though Illinois plumbing codes have since been updated. Always verify with your local building department before specifying pipe material for a permitted bathroom project. The cost of a code violation and required rework vastly exceeds the savings from choosing the wrong material.
PEX is prohibited outdoors or in any location with UV exposure, as ultraviolet light degrades polyethylene rapidly. All bathroom interior applications are unaffected by this restriction. The one scenario to watch is a bathroom addition with supply lines running under a crawl space with open vents or along an exterior wall with a gap: any UV-exposed section must be copper, CPVC, or properly shielded.
Not all PEX is identical. The three manufacturing methods produce tubing with different flexibility, burst pressure, and chlorine resistance characteristics.
| Property | PEX-A | PEX-B | PEX-C |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing method | Engel (peroxide) | Silane (moisture-cure) | Electron-beam irradiation |
| Flexibility | Highest | Moderate | Lowest of three |
| Connection method | Expansion (ProPEX) | Crimp / clamp | Crimp / clamp |
| Chlorine resistance | Best | Good | Moderate |
| Kink repair | Yes (heat gun) | No | No |
| Common brands | Uponor, Rehau | Viega, SharkBite, Watts | Zurn (some lines) |
| Relative material cost | Highest of PEX types | Moderate | Lowest |
For a bathroom renovation, PEX-A or PEX-B are the practical choices. PEX-A's expansion fittings sit inside the pipe diameter, creating smoother flow with less pressure drop -- meaningful if you are running long supply lines to a master bath shower with multiple heads. PEX-B crimp connections are equally reliable when properly installed and are compatible with a wider range of DIY-accessible tools available at hardware stores.
Your toilet's flush performance is governed by the toilet's trapway design, flush valve size, tank volume, and the flush mechanism -- not the supply pipe. Whether you run PEX or copper to the shutoff valve behind your toilet, the water delivery rate from tank refill to bowl is functionally identical for most residential pressure ranges (40 to 80 psi).
Where pipe material can indirectly affect toilet performance is in pressure drop across long runs. PEX-B crimp fittings reduce internal bore diameter slightly compared to expansion fittings, and copper elbows create known friction losses. In a bathroom at the far end of a long supply run from the main, pressure at the toilet fill valve could differ by a few psi depending on fitting count and type. In practice, this rarely affects refill time or flush quality at standard residential pressure.
For reference, high-MaP-rated toilets like the TOTO Drake (MaP score 1000 grams), TOTO UltraMax II (1000 grams), American Standard Champion 4 (1000 grams), and Kohler Cimarron (800 grams) all perform at their rated flush scores with standard residential water pressure, regardless of whether the supply line is PEX or copper. If you are specifying plumbing for a bathroom that will house one of these best-performing toilets, either pipe material is appropriate. See our guide to the best flushing toilets for MaP scores and water efficiency ratings side by side.
Plumbers who specialize in bathroom renovations consistently report that homeowners overestimate the impact of supply pipe material on toilet and fixture performance. The toilet trapway diameter, flush valve design, and tank size are the variables that determine flush power. The TOTO Drake II and American Standard Cadet 3 have achieved MaP scores of 800 grams or above at pressures as low as 20 psi -- well below what any properly installed PEX or copper supply line will deliver.
EPA WaterSense certification is a toilet (and faucet) program that verifies fixtures use 1.28 GPF or less while meeting MaP minimum flush performance thresholds of 350 grams. WaterSense specifications pertain to the fixture itself, not the supply pipe material. A WaterSense-certified toilet performs to its rated standard whether supplied by PEX or copper.
MaP (Maximum Performance) testing, conducted under IAPMO protocols at standard test pressures (40 and 80 psi), evaluates the toilet's ability to flush solid waste. Pipe material is not a variable in MaP testing. Toilets like the Woodbridge T-0001, Gerber Viper, Kohler Highline Arc, American Standard H2Option, and TOTO Aquia IV are all MaP-tested at the fixture level. Their scores represent inherent design performance, not plumbing-infrastructure-dependent outcomes. For a breakdown of how these models compare on GPF and MaP performance, see our 1.28 GPF vs 1.6 GPF guide and our coverage of ADA-compliant toilets.
The right answer depends on four factors: budget, local code, water chemistry, and installation method.
Choose PEX if: you are doing a full bathroom remodel or new build with a moderate budget, you are in a freeze-risk climate, you want to minimize labor cost, or you are considering a DIY rough-in. PEX-A from Uponor or PEX-B crimp from Viega or SharkBite are the most installer-friendly options available at major plumbing supply houses and home improvement retailers.
Choose copper if: your local code requires it, your water source is aggressive toward plastic (very high chloramine, low pH well water), you need to run pipe in an area with any UV exposure, you are making targeted repairs to an existing copper system (mixing PEX and copper requires dielectric transition fittings or compatible push-to-connect fittings to avoid galvanic issues), or you want maximum proven longevity in a property you plan to hold for 40-plus years.
For partial remodels: SharkBite push-to-connect transition fittings allow you to connect PEX to existing copper runs without soldering, making them practical for bathroom renovations where the main trunk lines are copper but supply branches to individual fixtures are being replaced or rerouted. These fittings are listed to ASTM F877 for PEX and ASTM B88 for copper and are accepted by most building codes for concealed applications, though some inspectors in certain jurisdictions may require access panels over concealed SharkBite connections -- confirm locally.
For guidance on specific bathroom plumbing upgrades that intersect with toilet performance -- such as rough-in distance, shutoff valve placement, or supply line sizing for dual-flush toilets -- see our guide to adding a bathroom toilet plumbing rough-in and our overview of air admittance valves for toilet venting.
Yes. PEX is code-approved for toilet supply lines in all jurisdictions that have adopted the current International Residential Code. Use a standard 3/8-inch compression angle stop at the shutoff valve and a braided stainless supply hose from the valve to the toilet fill valve.
PEX-A has a projected service life of 40 to 50 years in in-wall applications at standard water temperatures and pressures, per Plastic Pipe Institute data. Copper Type M is rated for 50 to 80 years. Both materials comfortably exceed typical 20-to-30-year renovation cycles in most residential bathrooms.
New PEX can impart a slight plastic odor to water that sits stagnant for extended periods. This diminishes after several weeks of use and is rarely noticeable in a bathroom sink with daily use. All NSF/ANSI 61-certified PEX meets potable-water safety standards for chemical leaching.
Yes. Use a PEX-to-copper transition fitting -- either a solder-on adapter or a SharkBite push-to-connect fitting -- at the junction. SharkBite fittings are the easiest option for retrofits and require no torch. Confirm your local inspector accepts concealed push-to-connect fittings before closing the wall.
3/4-inch PEX is standard for main branch lines feeding a bathroom; 1/2-inch PEX is used for individual fixture stub-outs to the toilet, sink, and shower valve. Undersizing to 3/8-inch on a shower supply in a high-demand household can reduce flow below comfortable levels during simultaneous fixture use.
Both are considered safe for potable water when installed to code. Copper has natural antimicrobial properties that can slow bacterial growth inside the pipe. PEX meets NSF/ANSI 61 for health effects. Neither presents a meaningful safety difference in a standard residential bathroom with regular daily water use.
Copper costs more upfront and has a higher recycling/salvage value at end of life. PEX costs less upfront and has a lower end-of-life value. If both materials last their rated service lives in your specific application, the lower initial cost of PEX represents a net lifecycle saving for most homeowners.
PEX is strongly preferred in cold climates. PEX expands when water inside freezes and returns to its original shape upon thawing without splitting. Copper splits at solder joints or along the pipe wall when ice pressure builds, often causing significant water damage. For bathrooms on exterior walls or above unheated spaces, PEX provides meaningful freeze insurance.
Yes. PEX is rated for hot water supply up to 200 degrees Fahrenheit, far above the maximum output of any residential shower valve (typically 120 degrees Fahrenheit at the mixing valve per ASSE 1016 anti-scald requirements). PEX handles hot and cold shower supply lines without pressure or temperature concerns under normal residential conditions.
Copper is still used in new construction, particularly in higher-end custom homes and commercial bathroom builds. However, the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) reports that PEX has overtaken copper as the dominant supply pipe material in new US residential construction as of the early 2020s, driven primarily by cost and installation speed.
No. Toilet models from TOTO, Kohler, American Standard, Woodbridge, Swiss Madison, and Gerber are all compatible with standard residential water pressure delivered by PEX or copper supply lines. The toilet's MaP score and flush valve design determine performance, not the supply pipe material.
A standard 1/2-inch PEX crimp or expansion stub-out connects to a 1/2-inch inlet angle stop (shutoff valve) with a compression fitting or a PEX-rated push-to-connect valve. From the angle stop to the toilet fill valve, use a standard 3/8-inch braided stainless supply line of appropriate length (typically 12 or 20 inches).
The Plastic Pipe Institute and manufacturer data (Uponor, Viega) project PEX-A service life at 40 to 50 years under normal residential conditions. Real-world performance data from European installations (where PEX has been used since the 1970s) supports this estimate. Actual lifespan varies with local water chemistry and chloramine levels.
CPVC (chlorinated polyvinyl chloride) is a third option accepted by most building codes for indoor supply lines. It is more rigid than PEX, requires solvent cement instead of torch or expansion tools, and is somewhat easier to install than copper but less flexible than PEX. CPVC is a practical choice but has largely been displaced by PEX in new residential construction.
At standard residential pressures (40 to 80 psi), both materials deliver essentially equivalent flow when properly sized. PEX-B crimp fittings reduce internal bore slightly more than PEX-A expansion fittings or copper solder fittings. In long runs with many fittings, PEX-A or copper may show marginally better pressure retention at the fixture, but the difference is rarely perceptible in typical bathroom use.
PEX is generally quieter than copper. Copper transmits water hammer and thermal expansion noise more readily due to its rigid nature. PEX absorbs some of the pipe movement and pressure-wave energy that causes the banging or ticking sounds homeowners notice with copper supply lines, particularly on hot water lines during thermal expansion cycles.
Both PEX (rated to 160 psi at 73 F per ASTM F876) and copper Type M (rated to 400 psi at room temperature) far exceed the maximum residential water pressure of 80 psi set by the Uniform Plumbing Code. Neither material is pressure-limited in any normal residential bathroom application.
Survey data from plumbing trade organizations (PHCC and ASPE) consistently shows that plumbers prefer PEX for residential bathroom remodels due to faster installation, lower material cost, no flame requirement, and equal code acceptance. Copper remains preferred for commercial, healthcare, and high-end luxury residential projects where longevity and antimicrobial properties are prioritized.
PEX-B with SharkBite push-to-connect or crimp fittings is within the skill range of a competent DIYer. You will need a pipe cutter, a PEX crimp tool or expansion tool depending on fitting type, and a deburring tool. Always pull a permit for supply line replacement in a bathroom -- inspectors in most jurisdictions require it, and unpermitted plumbing can complicate home sales and insurance claims.
In older homes where the main trunk lines are copper, a practical approach is to keep existing copper mains and use PEX-B with SharkBite transition fittings for new bathroom branch lines. This avoids disturbing older copper joints and saves cost on new fixture runs. If existing copper shows pitting, green corrosion, or has a history of pinhole leaks, replacing the entire bathroom supply run with PEX is the more cost-effective long-term solution.
For the majority of bathroom plumbing projects -- new builds, full remodels, fixture replacements, and partial renovations -- PEX-A or PEX-B is the better practical choice. It costs 60 to 70 percent less per linear foot than copper, installs without open flame, resists freeze-burst failure, and meets every applicable building code for residential bathroom supply lines. Copper remains the right choice where local ordinances require it, where aggressive water chemistry is a documented issue, or where a 60-plus-year service life is a specific design priority. In either case, neither pipe material affects the flush performance of your TOTO Drake, Kohler Cimarron, American Standard Champion 4, or any other toilet: flushing power is determined by trapway design, flush valve size, and tank volume -- not what runs inside the wall. Choose PEX for cost and practicality; choose copper for maximum proven longevity and antimicrobial properties. Both are solid decisions when installed correctly and to code.
How we rank & our data sources
We do not run physical lab tests. Rankings are built from published, verifiable data and real owner feedback, never paid placement.
Researched by Derek Whitman · Last updated August 14, 2026 · Our review method
See toilet water rippling or dropping while the tub drains? Learn why shared drains and blocked vents cause it, how to diagnose…
Read the guideOne toilet gurgling when you flush another points to a shared drain or vent problem. Learn the likely causes, how to diagnose…
Read the guideA toilet that gurgles when the washing machine drains points to a vent or drain line problem. Learn the likely causes, how…
Read the guide